Huq vs Geolytix: a side‑by‑side comparison

What differs in data scale, place coverage and day‑to‑day workflow.

Used by 300+ industry leaders

Make Smarter Decisions

Key numbers at a glance

Huq 1T+ vs Geolytix 214M Mobile pings & Huq 50M+ vs Geolytix 50k Places.

What these differences mean in practice when comparing Huq & Geolytix

Data scale & European coverage

Huq includes ~1 trillion mobile pings, 50M+ places and 5 years of history across the EU & ME. The larger data set supports finer‑grained catchments, more stable time‑series and better small‑area reads.

Specific, Site Selection Decisions

Huq lets you draw any boundary and compute metrics at ~50 m resolution, enabling site-specific analysis, while Geolytix focuses on area-level layers across standard boundaries. This means Huq supports more precise, micro-location decisions.

Sector fit & Initiative Match

Huq offers ready-made workflows for retail, local government and public-sector tasks, including expansion, competitor, portfolio and regeneration tracking with first-party data. Geolytix emphasises whole-area views from aggregated third-party sources, making it more suited to broader averages than micro-location analysis.

“Huq’s catchment insights allows JD to more accurately assess the impact of the wider retail catchment on the sales potential of new store opportunities”

Alastair Browne

JD Group Head of Site Research & Strategic Insight

"Huq’s platform gave us valuable data to support a key decision on potential new sites. It helped us validate assumptions and approach expansion with greater confidence. As we build on this, we see a lot of potential in using their insights more widely across our network strategy.”

Dan Brogden

National Sales Manager, Puccino's

FAQs

Common questions about Huq Platform answered clearly.

Is Huq a like‑for‑like replacement for Geolytix?

Coverage and workflow differ. Huq provides larger movement and place datasets and a more advanced no‑code, intuitive interface. Many teams can cover the same decisions (site selection, catchments, benchmarking) with fewer specialist steps.

How do you count “mobile pings” and “places”?

“Mobile pings” refers to aggregated, privacy‑first observations used for movement and footfall analysis. “Places” are deduplicated points of interest with metadata for retail and public‑realm assets. Counts reflect internal QA processes and may change as sources update.

How does data provenance affect accuracy?

With first‑party collection, Huq controls ingestion and QA end‑to‑end, which supports consistent measurement across time and geographies. Third‑party aggregation (per your input for Geolytix) can introduce variation between vendors. We recommend side‑by‑side trials against ground truth.

How granular are the results?

Huq computes metrics for custom shapes at ~50 m resolution. This is useful for micro‑locations (storefront clusters, station forecourts, plazas). Area‑level averages are still available when that view is appropriate.

What does switching involve?

Access provisioning, region setup, optional migration of saved areas as templates, and short role‑based training. All users are able to reproduce common analyses shortly after onboarding.

Still have questions?

Our team is ready to help. Contact us directly to discuss your requirements or book a personalised demo with real insights. 

Get In Touch
© 2025 Huq Industries. All right reserved.